InspectorLab

Checked

Super Model

$SMSolana

Checkedin 5m 47s · Oct 5, 14:44 UTC

Super Model (SM) is a Token-2022 memecoin launched on Pump.fun and trading in a PumpSwap SOL pool. The mint, freeze and metadata update authorities are all null, and the metadata is immutable. The "website" is a Pump.fun coin page, with no SM-specific utility, tokenomics or team information. The deployer is a serial launcher: 32 of its 33 neighbouring tokens are dead or unlisted, and it deployed several tokens within hours of this one. The linked X account is old and has been renamed. The tester's $5 buy succeeded, but creation and selling were not completed. The page showed a different creator rewards recipient from the creator, which contradicts the C2 claim. Market and liquidity figures move quickly and could not be confirmed for the stated capture time. Liquidity is small relative to the reported 24-hour volume.

pump.fun
Pump lets anyone create coins, giving everyone equal access to buy and sell from the start. Prices can move quickly, so trade carefully.

Pump says its platform lets anyone create coins and buy and sell them from the start.

UntestedNot tested this run. Checked against Wallet test

The tester's $5 buy on Pump succeeded and was verified on-chain. Coin creation failed at the image-upload step and the sell was only simulated and rejected, so the claim as a whole is unsettled.

To settle it: Use the platform's coin-creation and trading flows; creation/trading transactions can also be checked on Solana.

Wallet test, inconclusive: The welcome text says Pump lets anyone create coins and buy and sell from the start. A $5 Pump AMM buy succeeded for 4,318.902791 SM. The buy transaction and its SOL/token deltas were verified on-chain. Creation was only attempted through the form; selling was only quoted/simulated. Since the claim covers creation and buying and selling, the successful buy alone does not settle the whole claim. No evidence of an on-chain creation or sell was produced.

Skeptic: plausible

Pump.fun describes a platform for creating coins and buying or selling them; this is a platform feature claim, not a claim that SM itself has utility.

pump.fun
SM Super Model Aqv8…pump Chain and launchpad: Pump Creator rewards recipient: Rewards → creator

The SM page identifies Super Model as a Pump-launched token at the supplied address, with creator rewards routed to the creator.

RefutedContradicted by Wallet test, Token facts, Metadata

The tester saw the page show MaxBloomGinger as Creator but VibeCurseShark at 100% of creator rewards. That contradicts rewards being routed to the creator. The on-chain lookup does support the token being a Pump-tradable Token-2022 mint named Super Model (SM).

Wallet test, refuted: The page shows MaxBloomGinger as Creator but shows VibeCurseShark at 100% under Creator rewards. Since the displayed rewards recipient differs from the displayed creator, the assertion that rewards are routed to the creator is contradicted by the page. On-chain lookup confirms the supplied address is a Token-2022 mint named Super Model (SM), with no mint or freeze authority; the successful Pump AMM trade supports that the token is tradable on Pump, but does not prove its launch history or a reward payout.

Skeptic: plausible

The SM page identifies the supplied token as Pump-launched and displays creator rewards routed to the creator. That establishes what the platform displays, not the amount or reliability of any rewards.

Receipts
  • 005269
pump.fun
Market cap $570K 24h vol $6.11M Holders 3,362

The SM token page reports market and trading metrics, including a displayed market cap of $570K, 24-hour volume of $6.11M, and 3,362 holders at capture time.

UntestedNot tested this run. Checked against Wallet test, Market

The usage test was inconclusive. It saw similar but different values across snapshots (market cap about $559K to $576K, holders 3,339 to 3,353), and our market data shows $596K market cap and $5.87M volume. The figures at the stated capture time were not independently confirmed.

To settle it: Compare current market/volume displays with independent market data and inspect token accounts on Solana; these displayed values are time-sensitive.

Wallet test, inconclusive: The page displayed 24-hour volume of $6.11M. Across snapshots, the displayed market cap moved from approximately $559K to $576K and the holder count changed (initially 3,353, then 3,341 and 3,339). These are time-sensitive and do not establish whether the claimed $570K and 3,362 were accurate at the stated capture time. The available on-chain account query did not provide a complete holder census or independent volume metric.

Skeptic: plausible

The page displays market cap of $564K, 24-hour volume of $6.11M, and 3,353 holders. These are platform snapshots and do not establish future price performance or durable demand.

Receipts
pump.fun
Pool information Paired with SOL Total liquidity $39.01K (326.19 SOL)

The SM page displays the token's liquidity as paired with SOL and reports total liquidity of $39.01K (326.19 SOL).

UntestedNot tested this run. Checked against Wallet test, Market

The usage test was inconclusive. The pool is paired with SOL on PumpSwap, which matches the claim. Later observations showed about $55.8K and then $83K, against the claimed $39.01K. The value at the capture time was not established.

To settle it: Inspect the pool and its reserves on-chain; liquidity values fluctuate.

Wallet test, inconclusive: The page labeled the pool as paired with SOL and at the live observation displayed about $55.78K (466.44 SOL), while the queried SOL token account held 466.47867348 SOL, consistent with that contemporaneous SOL amount. This differs from the claimed historical $39.01K (326.19 SOL), but liquidity is time-sensitive and no historical pool state for the stated capture time was established.

Skeptic: plausible

The page displays a SOL-paired pool with $38.8K total liquidity (324.43 SOL). Liquidity and market figures vary over time, so this is a point-in-time report rather than a fixed project reserve.

Receipts
pump.fun
Admin permissions revoked

The token page reports that admin permissions have been revoked.

HeldHolds up against Token facts, Metadata

On-chain, mintAuthority and freezeAuthority are null, updateAuthority is null and the metadata is immutable. There is no permanent delegate, transfer hook or transfer fee, so no admin permissions remain.

Wallet test, confirmed: The page states “Admin permissions revoked.” The mint lookup independently reports no mint authority and no freeze authority, consistent with the page's claim.

Skeptic: plausible

The token page reports that admin permissions have been revoked. This rates the page's stated status, not a broader guarantee about token safety or project quality.

Receipts

InspectorLab lists and checks; it doesn't rule. Nothing here is financial advice. Every verdict cites the stored files it rests on.