InspectorLab

Checked

Super Model

$SMSolana

Checkedin 1m 03s · Oct 5, 12:58 UTC

Super Model (SM) is a Token-2022 memecoin on Solana that trades on PumpSwap. The mint, freeze and metadata update authorities are all revoked, and no transfer hooks, fees or permanent delegate are set. The "website" is a coincommunities.org link that shows Pump.fun's coin page. It has no separate project, team, roadmap or utility. The deployer is a serial launcher: 32 of its 33 other tokens are dead or unlisted, and it was funded by a high-activity wallet. The X account is old, recycled and renamed. The token launched hours ago and has about $1.08M market cap against about $112k liquidity, so exit liquidity is thin. A test buy worked on-chain, but token creation could not be completed and no sell was tested.

pump.fun
Pump lets anyone create coins, giving everyone equal access to buy and sell from the start.

Pump.fun says it allows anyone to create coins and buy or sell from the start.

UntestedNot tested this run. Checked against Wallet test

This is a platform feature claim. The tester bought SM on-chain through the AMM and the sell controls were enabled. Coin creation could not be completed, so the combined claim was inconclusive.

To settle it: Use the Pump.fun create flow and trading interface with a compatible wallet; confirm the available actions and any transaction requirements.

Wallet test, inconclusive: The site states that anyone can create coins and buy/sell from the start; the create form and buy/sell controls were available, and the buy worked. Since I could not complete a coin launch or verify its launch transaction, the combined claim is inconclusive rather than a refutation. Pump.fun's own connected-wallet panel showed $0.00 despite the fork wallet having 5 SOL, but the quick buy still proceeded using the chain wallet. The successful buy used the Pump AMM program, spent 0.213516607 SOL overall, and delivered 21,443.327552 SM. A previous signed attempt expired without changing balances.

Skeptic: plausible

Pump.fun describes itself as allowing coin creation and immediate trading, consistent with the site and the token listing. This is a platform feature, not a claim that SM has utility or value. [E1][E5]

pump.fun
SM 7sa Aqv8…pump ... Piyasa değeri $1.14M Hacim 24s $5.75M Sahipler 3,603

The Pump.fun listing identifies mint Aqv8Gj8MesSzuEsgigq4kEDWVRFHgPUZq4Po4Q1Mpump as SM / Super Model and displays live market and holder statistics.

HeldHolds up against Token facts, Metadata, Market, Wallet test

The on-chain mint is Super Model / SM. DexScreener-style market data shows it listed with about $1.08M market cap, about $5.5M 24h volume and a PumpSwap pair. The tester matched the page figures to a direct mint lookup, and the page showed about 3,603 holders.

Wallet test, confirmed: The mint address supplied in the URL is Aqv8Gj8MesSzuEsgigq4kEDWVRFHgPUZq4Po4Q1Mpump. On-chain lookup identified it as Super Model (SM), Token-2022, supply 974,044,430,777,226 raw units at 6 decimals. The page displayed time-varying values (for example, approximately 3,603 holders, $1.15M market cap, and $56.13K / 466.23 SOL liquidity in the initial snapshot); these are Pump.fun's live/indexed market statistics, not mint-account fields, and changed during browsing.

Skeptic: plausible

The supplied mint is listed as SM / Super Model, and the page displays market, volume, and holder figures. These are changeable platform statistics, not independent proof of value or reliable exit liquidity. [E5]

Receipts
  • 8f9871
pump.fun
Yönetici izinleri iptal edildi

The coin page reports that creator/admin permissions have been revoked.

HeldHolds up against Token facts, Metadata, Wallet test

On-chain, mintAuthority and freezeAuthority are null and the metadata is immutable with no update authority. This supports the revocation notice for the token's key authorities. The scope of the page's wording is not fully explained.

Wallet test, confirmed: The page says administrator permissions have been revoked (shown in Turkish in the page snapshot). On-chain, both mint authority and freeze authority are absent. This supports revocation of those key token authorities; Pump.fun does not explain the notice's full scope, so this should not be read as independently proving every possible platform or program-level permission is gone.

Skeptic: plausible

The coin page reports that admin permissions were revoked. That is an on-page statement; this review did not independently verify the underlying on-chain permissions. [E5]

Receipts
  • 8f9871
pump.fun
Geliştirici 0.0%

The coin page displays a developer holding percentage of 0.0%.

HeldHolds up against Wallet test, Holders, Deployer

The page displays 0.0% developer holding, and the tester confirmed the display. The top holders listed are the pool and other wallets, with top10 at about 22%. The attribution of the figure to creator-linked wallets was not independently verified, and the deployer has a serial-launch history.

Wallet test, confirmed: The page displayed developer holding as 0.0%. The page identifies the creator as MaxBloomGinger, but I could not independently verify the underlying percentage against creator-associated on-chain accounts: the displayed identity is a username rather than a wallet address in the captured information. Thus the displayed figure is confirmed, while its attribution/calculation is not independently established here.

Skeptic: plausible

The page displays developer ownership as 0.0%, but that display alone does not establish that there are no related wallets or other concentrated holdings. [E5]

Receipts
  • 8f9871
pump.fun
Prices can move quickly, so trade carefully.

Pump.fun warns that prices can move quickly and advises careful trading.

UnverifiableCan't be checked. Read against Market, Skeptic

This is a generic risk warning, not a testable factual claim. The token's observed volatility and thin liquidity are consistent with it.

Skeptic: plausible

The platform’s warning that prices can move quickly is reasonable for a freely traded token and is not a promise of safety or returns. [E1]

InspectorLab lists and checks; it doesn't rule. Nothing here is financial advice. Every verdict cites the stored files it rests on.