Spread

$SpreadSolana

Checkedin 3m 41s · Oct 5, 12:45 UTC

Spread (SPREAD) is a Token-2022 token on Solana with no mint or freeze authority and immutable metadata. It is promoted by a site that runs a fee-funded coin-copy system on pump.fun. Our usage test confirmed that a vault received SOL and a pump.fun copy launched three seconds later, and that the 0.0062 SOL threshold matches the displayed launch cost. It also confirmed the pump.fun venue and the live stats. The claim that copies keep the original's contract address was refuted: copies have their own mints and numbered names. The paid launch flow was inconclusive. The wallet request was only a plain SOL transfer to a new account, with no launch instruction, and the tester rejected it. No team is named, and the deployer was funded by a high-activity wallet. The token launched the same day as the X account (2026-10-05), and its 24h volume is large relative to its market cap.

spreadonchain.funproductC1

When it collects enough fees, it launches new coins. Every new coin's fees flow back in and fund the next ones.

SPREAD says its system launches copy coins when a coin network accumulates enough fees, and that the copies' fees fund subsequent launches.

HeldHolds up against Wallet test

The usage test saw a 0.00696 SOL vault deposit followed three seconds later by a successful pump.fun copy launch. This is one observed network, not proof of every historical launch.

Wallet test, confirmed: This supports the described fee-to-copy behavior for the observed network activity: the site's fee/launch entries correspond to real pump.fun launches, and the vault received SOL shortly before a copy launch. This is an observation of this network, not independent proof that every historical launch was caused by its preceding fees.

Skeptic: doubtful

Pooling fees to pay for additional launches is mechanically possible, but ongoing growth depends on actual fee inflows exceeding costs; repeated launches do not guarantee new coins attract trading or generate fees. The claimed live totals are not independently verified here.

spreadonchain.funtokenomicsC2

The threshold is simply what the next launch costs right now: ≈ 0.0062 SOL (~$0.75)

The site states that its launch threshold is based on the current cost of the next launch and gives an approximate example of 0.0062 SOL (~$0.75).

HeldHolds up against Wallet test

The launch form and network page showed a 0.0062 SOL threshold, consistent with the observed deposit and launch. The USD conversion was not independently checked.

Wallet test, confirmed: The form displayed a launch cost of 0.0062 SOL; the network page also stated that the next copy launches when the vault has 0.0062 SOL and displayed 0.0073 SOL in vault. A 0.006957783 SOL deposit to the vault was followed by a pump.fun copy launch three seconds later. This is consistent with the approximate threshold example, though the displayed USD conversion and cost formula were not independently established from chain data.

Skeptic: plausible

A stated approximate, current launch-cost threshold is possible and is presented as variable rather than a fixed return. The estimate itself was not independently verified against current pump.fun costs.

spreadonchain.funproductC3

Every new coin carries the original's name, image and contract address.

SPREAD says newly launched coins retain the original coin's name, image and contract address.

RefutedContradicted by Wallet test

Copies have distinct mints and numbered names (e.g. 'Yersinia pestis #2' with a different mint from the parent). They do not keep the original's name or contract address. Image bytes were not compared.

Wallet test, refuted: The observed copy did not retain the parent's literal token name or contract address: the parent mint is GdKveaShw9uy7KPWbFEe59hrh9L8SKKKYjgMKjWwhjbs named “Yersinia pestis,” while the #2 copy has a distinct mint, 6F1un4uUkcJR5wdkthGmVatKAcwkjGZ27yUjtEQtgyxQ, named “Yersinia pestis #2.” A later copy's launch event likewise named “Yersinia pestis #594.” I could not independently compare the image bytes; the differing name and mint are sufficient to refute the claim as phrased.

Skeptic: implausible

As worded, a newly launched coin cannot retain the original coin’s contract address: a distinct token has a distinct mint/address. It could mean the copy links back to the original, but the site does not clarify this.

spreadonchain.funotherC4

Coins launch on pump.fun (Solana). A meme, not an investment. Crypto is risky — only use what you can afford to lose.

The site says coins launch on pump.fun on Solana and describes SPREAD as a meme, not an investment.

HeldHolds up against Wallet test

Observed copy-creation transactions invoke pump.fun on Solana. The disclaimer text is present on the site.

Wallet test, confirmed: SPREAD links the Yersinia pestis parent and copies to pump.fun; the observed copy-creation transactions invoke pump.fun and create token-2022 mints. The site also states that coins launch on pump.fun on Solana and calls SPREAD a meme, not an investment.

Skeptic: plausible

The site says coins launch on pump.fun on Solana and describes SPREAD as a meme rather than an investment. Pump.fun’s official site describes a coin creation and trading platform; that is consistent with the stated venue but does not confirm SPREAD’s particular integration.

spreadonchain.funproductC5

38 COINS LAUNCHED 2,315 COPIES CREATED $1,541 TOTAL FEES COLLECTED 38 ACTIVE NETWORKS

The site displays live network and leaderboard metrics, including claimed totals for coins launched, copies created, fees collected and active networks.

HeldHolds up against Wallet test, Site capture

The live stats, leaderboard and network pages were displayed, and the tester observed on-chain launches and vault movements consistent with them. The aggregate totals were not fully reconciled, and the figures changed between views (2,315 vs 2,348 copies), which fits a live counter.

Wallet test, confirmed: The site displayed 38 coins launched, 2,348 copies created, $1,560 fees collected, and 38 active networks; the leaderboard and detail pages showed per-network coin and fee totals. The observed on-chain transactions support that launches and vault-related SOL movements occur, but I did not independently reconcile the site's aggregate totals or dollar-denominated fees against all chain activity.

Skeptic: doubtful

The site displays network and fee totals, but displaying metrics does not establish their accuracy or that fees were collected and used as described. They were not independently checked against chain data here.

spreadonchain.funproductC6

Approve payment in your wallet; Payment confirmed on Solana; Launching your coin on pump.fun

The launch flow asks for wallet payment approval and says it will launch the coin on pump.fun after payment confirmation.

UntestedNot tested this run. Checked against Wallet test

The usage test was inconclusive. The wallet request was only a System Program transfer of about 0.0142 SOL to a new account with no launch instruction, and the tester rejected it. Whether a coin launches after payment was not verified.

To settle it: Use the launch flow with a Solana wallet and inspect the transaction request and resulting on-chain launch. Do not approve unless the transaction details are understood.

Wallet test, inconclusive: The form said the user would pay 0.0142 SOL and that this would launch a coin. The request was only a System Program transfer of 14,237,508 lamports to 7USy5CF1iu2jkA2SGo7hRpMuGbRJLYzd3MUqjhf7379k, plus the transaction fee; it contained no pump.fun or token-launch instruction. The recipient was a new account with no transaction history. I rejected it rather than trust an unexplained payment recipient, so I could not test whether the site's server would launch a coin after payment confirmation. Wallet balance remained 5 SOL.

Skeptic: plausible

A wallet-connected payment followed by a coin launch is a technically plausible flow. The site describes this process, but this review did not test a transaction or independently verify that payment triggers a launch.